This syllabus is under construction & subject to change.


VICTIMOLOGY 340 & 540

Spring 2006

Thursday 6:00 pm

 

                                                                  


                    

 

 

Instructor:       Michelle Meloy, Ph.D.

Office:             405-407 Cooper Street, suite 205

Phone:               (856) 225-2724

Office Hrs:      Monday 11:00 to 12:00 pm and by appointment

E-mail:             mlmeloy@rutgers.edu

                

REQUIRED TEXTS


Crime Victims by Andrew Karmen, 5th edition

 

Victims and victimization by David Shichor and Stephen Tibbetts


In the name of hate: Understanding hate crimes by Barbara Perry


Understanding sexual violence: A study of convicted rapists  by Diana Scully


Lucky
by Alice Sebold

News coverage of violence against women: Engendering  blame by Marian Meyers 

 

 

The study of victims and the science of victimology, as a distinctive area of independent scholarship, is relatively new.  The contemporary criminal justice system did not view victims as important players in the processing of criminal cases nor were victims believed to be instrumental in understanding the etiology of crime.  As a matter of fact, until the last two decades, crime victims were virtually ignored by criminal justice officials, academic researchers, and social policy makers. This is no longer true.  Criminal justice protocol now permits victims to have a voice in how their victimizations are resolved. Researchers have discovered the importance of victim activity and victim offender relationships in understanding, predicting, and deterring crime, and politicians and activists have embraced victims, even if only symbolically. 

 

In this course we trace the historical and legal developments that were instrumental in changing the status of crime victims within the justice system. We also critically evaluate the impact of the victim's rights era and discuss who is included and excluded in these reforms.  One theme that resonates throughout our discussions, week in and week out, is the notion of victim prominence and social capital.  These subjective evaluations impact how the system responds to a crime and the victim's experience within the legal structure.  Perceptions of victims' social capital have implications for the politicization of crime victim types and victimology as a science. This course pays particular attention to the violent victimizations of women, children and minorities.

 

Examinations:  There are two examinations in this course designed to test your understanding of the discussions, readings, and supplemental material. The first exam occurs about mid-semester and is an in class essay examination.  In the final weeks of the semester you will schedule and take an oral examination with the instructor.  By the end of this course, I expect you have mastered its primary themes and that you can think critically and converse intelligently on them.  If not, we have both failed in our duties.

 

Exam grades will be computed as follows: 90-100% = A; 89-85% = B+; 84-80=B; 79-75% = C+; 74-70%= C and so on.  Check with your respective graduate programs or undergraduate department to determine the grade necessary for this course to count towards your graduation.  No make up examinations will be permitted except for emergency situations.  Situations that qualify as an emergency are dictated by university standards and must be accompanied by appropriate documentation. The format of make up exams may vary at the discretion of the instructor.  Having said this, I understand that this is a graduate seminar and I expect that you are in attendance because you WANT to be here.  If family, work or health complications make it impossible to have your work completed as scheduled, you must contact me immediately.  Extensions will be made on a case-by-case basis.

 

Grading:  Both exams are worth 25% of the cumulative points for a total of 50% of your final course grade.  You are also required to write a seminar research paper (20-25 pages in length) on a mutually agreed upon topic (between instructor and student) that is due in the final days of the semester. Although the minimum and maximum page limits apply to all enrolled students, I expect that the graduate students will have selected a research topic worthy of at least 20 pages of text.  Research papers require special skills.  For instance, a distinct writing style or “tone” is used.  Also, research papers are empirical and/or theoretical explorations on the issue(s).  This means that only certain data, sources, and search engines are appropriate.  Please see me if you have questions.  Students who fail to turn in an acceptable final research paper  can  not receive a passing  grade in the course.  

 

The research paper accounts for 25% of your total grade. In addition, each student is required to present his/her research findings in class.  Each presenter should plan a 10-20 minute talk.  Presentations that include visual accessories (such as power point, overheads, hand-outs, etc.) or other forms of creativity are encouraged. Finally, students should be reminded that this course is a graduate seminar.   This means that rather than relying only on the instructor to lecture on material we utilize a discussion format. I view this class as a reciprocal learning process. I learn from you, and hopefully, you will learn from meI expect students to come to class prepared to discuss the assigned readings.  Nothing less will be tolerated.  If you are unable to fully commit to this obligation, you should drop this course immediately.  Stated another way, you will not pass this course unless you come to class prepared!  The expectations for course performance and participation are the same for both graduate and undergraduate students. Each week we will have designated student leaders.  Everyone is required to perform in the student leader role.   During your time as student leader, I expect you to be “extra prepared” for the weeks assigned readings.

 

Mid-Term Exam           25%

Oral (Final) Exam        25%

Paper & Presentation    25%

Student Leader            10%
Participation                15%

 

Academic Dishonesty: Under no circumstances will academic dishonesty be tolerated. Academic dishonesty includes cheating on exams, helping another cheat, or taking someone else's work and passing it off as your own. Plagiarism, as a form of academic dishonesty, includes using someone else's work or ideas without proper citation. There are stringent regulations regarding the use of proper citations. If you have questions about when citation is required or how to correctly paraphrase anther's work and/or when to use quotations, refer to the APA manual.  If you are still unclear about these issues,  see me immediately.   Recently, plagiarism from the internet has become an increasing problem, especially "clipping and pasting" information from online sources and using it as your own work and/or failing to give the source appropriate credit.

 

Unfortunately, I often have students in violation of the academic dishonesty standards set forth in the Rutgers University handbook and reiterated on the sociology home page http://sociology.camden.rutgers.edu . All violations of academic dishonesty will immediately be referred to Rutgers University officials.  The specific rules governing academic dishonesty are addressed in the University catalog and student handbook.  Sanctions range from failing the course to expulsion from the  University. *Be aware that all papers are required to be turned over to me in hard copy and electronically (on a 3.5 inch disk, CD or DVD & be labeled with your name) so they can they can be searched for plagiarism in multiple ways.*

Course Outline and Reading Assignments:  This is a general outline and is subject to change based on the discretion of the instructor. Readings may be added or deleted per instructor's discretion.

 

Week 1 (January 19): Class Introductions

Course overview, professor and student introductions.

Karmen: The Rediscovery of Crime Victims, The Rise of Victimology,  Ch.1

Shichor & Tibbetts: Introduction, pgs. 1-11

*Week 2 (January 26): Background Info & Victim-Oriented Theories
Karman: Statistical facts & The Victim's Contribution to the Crime Problem, & Victims & CJS, Ch.2-4

Shichor & Tibbetts: Chapter 1 (Victims by Geis), Chapter 2 (Some problematic concepts...by Fattah) & Chapter 3 (Routine activities by Felson)


Submit a one page TYPED paper stating your proposed victimology related research topic. Include commentary regarding the relevance/significance of the proposed area of study to this course and any references you currently have.

 

Week 3 (February 2): Intimate Partner Violence & Adult Domestic victimization 

Karmen: Family Violence (pgs. 225-227) & Violence between intimates  (pgs. 229-246)
Shichor & Tibbets: Chapter 8 (Attributions of self-blame by O'Neill & Kerig), & Chapter 9 (Labeleing Parnter Violence by Hamby & Gray-Little)
additional reading:
Prevalence, Incidence and Consequences of Violence Against Women
additional reading:
Costs of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women
additional reading:
Controlling Violence Against Women: A Research Perspective

check out the below web site for a comprehensive list of national dv victim resources/organizations:
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ovc/help/dv.htm

 

Note to student leaders: What is meant by the term intimate partner violence? How does it differ from terms like "domestic violence, "dating violence," and "family violence"?   Do these other terms explain different behaviors and victim offender relationships? In what ways are these crimes similar to one another? How common is family violence? What characteristics are associated with an increased risk of victimization? What is the typical gendered offending/victimization pattern associated with these crimes? What types of policies exist to deal with intimate partner violence, family violence, battery, etc.? What does victim empowerment mean? Are the policies dealing with these crimes effective? If so, in what ways? What are some of the unexpected "costs" to victims of well intentioned policies? In what ways? *What policy suggestions can YOU think of to better assist victims? How are these policies different from existing criminal justice protocol?* Additional research/reading may be necessary to prepare for this presentation.

Week 4 (February 9)  Stalking

Karmen: Stalking Victims pgs 273-276

Brewster, Mary (2003) Power and control dynamics in prestalking and stalking situations,  Journal of Family Violence,  18, 4, 207-217.

Grovers, Renee et al. (2004) The influence of prior offender/victim relationship on offender stalking behavior, Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 1, 153-167
Kinkade, Patrick et al., (2005) Criminalizing Attractions: Perceptions of Stalking and the Stalker, Crime & Delinquency, 51, 1, 3-25.
Melton, Heather (2004) Stalking in the context of domestic violence: Findings on the criminal justice system, Women & Criminal Justice, 15, 3-4, 33-58.
O'Connor, Maureen & Rosenfeld, Barry (2004) Introduction to the special issue on stalking, Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 1, 3-8.

Rosenfeld, Barry. (2004) Violence risk factors in stalking an obsessional harassment, Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 1, 9-36.
Sheridan, L.P. & E. Blaauw (2004) Characteristics of false stalking reports, Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 1, 55-72. 



recommended reading:  U.S. Department of Justice: Stalking & (Domestic Violence)

Recommended reading/additional resources: Stalking Resource Center

 

Note to student leaders: Define what stalking is and how technology has created a new type of stalking victim. What are some of the motives and dynamics of the crime of stalking? What is the typical victim offender relationship associated with this crime? How closely does this reality match the media presentation of stalking? What event(s) placed the issue of stalking in the national spotlight? How common is stalking? Why is it often associated with the crime of domestic violence? What type of policies exist to deal with stalking? Are the policies effective? In what ways? *What policy suggestions can YOU think of to better assist victims? How are the policies different from existing criminal justice protocol?* Additional research/reading may be necessary to prepare for this presentation.

 

 

*Week 5 (February 16) Adult Sexual Victimization

Scully, Understanding Sexual Violence (entire book)
Karmen, Victims of sexual assault (pgs. 247-271)
Bachman, R & Paternoster, R. (1990) Impact of Rape Reform Legislation  (class hand-out)

additional reading: each student is required to bring 1-2 journal or newspaper articles to class on the topic of sexual assault victimization. These readings should highlight issues relevant to the victim's experience or legal processing of these crimes.

Note to student leaders: What is the legal definition of sexual assault and how does it differ from the crime of rape? What is the typical victim offender relationship associated with this crime? How prevalent is this crime type? Why is sexual assault/rape believed to be so common in our culture and other patriarchal cultures like ours? What factors or motivations are believed to be associated with sex crimes? What type of victim-oriented policies exist and what are the goals associated with them? Are the policies effective? In what ways? *What policy suggestions can YOU think of to better assist victims? How are these policies different from existing criminal justice protocol?* Additional research/reading may be necessary to prepare for this presentation.

Rough Draft of Research Paper Due:
Submit a 3-5 page paper on your research topic. Your introductory paragraph should be a “road map” to the rest of the paper. You should inform the reader of what to expect in the following pages. Be certain your rough draft contains (1) a clearly defined -- and pre-approved -- research topic and/or research question, (2) a statement of why the issue is of social importance, and (3) a working bibliography.


Week 6 (February 23) Crimes against children,adolescents abuse & young adults
Sebold, Lucky (entire book)
Karmen: Child victimization (pgs. 195-224)
Shichor & Tibbetts: Chapter 5 (Children as Victims by Office for Victims of Crime) & Chapter 6 (Internet crimes by Office for Victims of Crime)
Haugaard, J & Seri, L (2004) Stalking and other forms of intrusive contact among adolescents and young adults, Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 1, 37-54.
Phillips, L., et al (2004) Is it stalking: Perceptions among college undergraduates, Criminal Justice and Behavior,  31, 1, 73-96.

additional reading: Sexual Assault Against Children @ttp://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/saycrle.pdf
additional reading: Child Victimizers @http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cvvoatvx.pdf
additional reading: US News Report on Child Molesters @http://www.cnn.com/US/9608/29/castration/

Note to student leaders: Operationalize (i.e., clearly define) the victimization types covered this week.  What behaviors are contained under the heading child victimization? Which types are most prevalent? What are the motivations of offenders or theories of offending that best explain these crime types? What role does technology play for these victims? What are some of its pros and cons? Do younger stalking victims have unique experiences? Explain. What polices exist to help these victims and what are their goals? Are these policies effective? What recommendations would YOU make to better assist these victims?

Note to readers of "Lucky," be prepared to discuss the following: What attempts did Alice make to protect herself from the rape? What did she do when she thought her attacker would kill her? What role did shame play in her survival? How did her family respond to the rape? What relevant life-family experiences were discussed in the book? How did the attack affect Alice's relationship with her family, friends, and her dating life? How did the officials respond to her victimization? Did race play a role in this case? How so? Describe her questioning by the district attorney, the grand jury experience, the trial? Were there examples of victim-blaming in the book? Victim-defending? How important was Alice's virginity? Explain.  Was the victim-impact statement empowering for Alice? Elaborate. How did this event impact Alice's life after college? Is this common for rape victims?

*Week 7 (March 2): Mid-term (in-class) examination!  

Week 8: (March 9) Media's Presentation of Violence & White-collar victimizations
Meyers, News coverage of violence against women (entire book)
Shichor & Tibbetts, Chapter 4, Chapter 11 & Chapter 12

additional readings: each student must bring to class 1 newspaper or journal article on topics relevant to the media's coverage of crime AND identity-fraud issues or another type of white-collar crime.  In other words, each student should have 2 articles total - one on both topics.

Note to student leaders: What are some of the major issues that arise with respect to the media's handling of gendered violence? What priorities or factors guide media decisions regarding which cases to highlight and which cases to ignore? What role does an offender's and  victim's gender, race, class, ethnicity and sexual orientation play in how the media handles a crime story? What victim offender profiles are most and least likely to receive media attention in a crime of violence? Why is this? How comon is white-collar crime? What are some of the primary issues identified in the readings regarding these victimizations?  Does the criminal justice see these victimization types differently than "street" crimes? Explain. What victim-oriented policies or legislation exist to protect victims from re-victimization by the media or from white-collar crimes?  Are the policies effective? In what ways? *What policy suggestions can YOU think of to better assist victims? How are these policies different from existing criminal justice protocol?*  Additional research/reading may be necessary to prepare for this presentation.

Week 9 (March 16) Spring Break! No class


Week 10: (March 23) Hate-crime victimizations

Perry, In the name of hate (entire book)

Karmen, Victims of bias crimes (pgs. 277-289)
Shichor & Tibbetts, Chapter 13 (Characteristics of hate-crime victimizations by Levin)
Readings TBA

Note to student leaders: What are some of the major issues that arise with respect to this class of victimization? What are the risk factors associated with this type of offending or victimization?  What high-profile cases have brought this crime into the public's awareness? What victim offender profiles/relationships are most likely to be present with this crime type?  How comon are these crimes believed to be?   What victim-oriented policies or legislation exist to protect victims from this crime? Are the policies effective? In what ways? *What policy suggestions can YOU think of to better assist victims? How are these policies different from existing criminal justice protocol?*  Additional research/reading may be necessary to prepare for this presentation.


Week 11: (March 30) Comprehensive policy issues

Karmen, alternative directions, pgs. 328-366

Policy Issues: Shichor & Tibbets, Society & The Victim, Chapters 15-21
Readings TBA

Note to student leaders: What type(s) of policies are currently in place to assist victims? Do they benefit and serve the needs of all crime victims equally? Explain.  Are these policies effective? In what ways? Some scholars suggest that restorative justice or peace-making criminology offer greater promise for increasing public safety as compared with traditional criminal justice responses.  What theories and research support this contention?  How would these policies likely impact crime victims? Are there some crime victim-types that may be especially vulnerable to harm from these alternative approaches?  *What policy suggestions can YOU think of to better assist victims? How are these policies different from existing criminal justice protocol?*  Additional research/reading may be necessary to prepare for this presentation.

Week 12: (April 6) Formal Class Presentations.
Individual presentations should not exceed 20 minutes!

 

Week 13: (April 13) Formal Class Presentations

 

Individual presentations should not exceed 20 minutes!


Week 14:
(April 20) Oral Final Examination

Expect to spend 30-45 minutes on your individual oral examination.

 

Week 15: (April 27) Oral Final Examination

Expect to spend 30-45 minutes on your individual oral examination.


Week 16: (May 4) Oral Final Examination

Expect to spend 30-45 minutes on your individual oral examination.

 

RESEARCH PAPERS ARE DUE NO LATER THAN  6:00 pm  May 4th.  No exceptions.